Pabasa—How It Started

It didn’t begin as singing. It became one voice after another, carrying a story that refuses to stop.

Holy Week in the Philippines has a sound. A steady chant. Voices taking turns. A story moving forward, line by line. That sound is Pabasa (chanting of the Passion).

But it didn’t begin as singing.

It started during the Spanish period, around the 1500s, when missionaries brought Christianity to the Philippines. The story of Jesus Christ was there, but there was a problem. The Bible was in Latin or Spanish, and most Filipinos spoke their own languages. Many could not read formal texts.

So the message had to change form.

Instead of teaching through books, they turned the story into poetry. This became the Pasyon (Passion of Christ), a long Tagalog poem that tells the life, suffering, death, and resurrection of Jesus. It was easier to remember, easier to follow, and closer to how people already shared stories.

The real change came from the people.

Filipinos began to chant the Pasyon. They gave it melody. They turned it into something you don’t just read, but continue. One voice starts, another follows, then another. Hours pass. The story keeps going.

That became Pabasa.

It wasn’t planned and it wasn’t designed as a performance. It simply grew that way.

Over time, it moved beyond the church. Families started doing it at home. Neighborhoods joined in. Some offered it as a personal devotion, others as a shared act during Holy Week.

You don’t need a stage. You don’t need training. You just continue the line.

That’s why it stayed.

Pabasa is about keeping the story alive across voices and across time.

What began as a way to teach became something deeper. Not just something we understand, but something we take part in.

Even now, when everything is fast, Pabasa moves slowly.

And maybe that’s the point.

The story is not rushed. It is carried.

And as long as someone is willing to take the next line, it will not stop.

⌨ ᴛʸᵖⁱⁿᵍ ᴏᵘᵗ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ʙˡᵘᵉ ᵈᵃʳᵉᵐ ᵐᵘˢⁱᶜ ᵇˡᵒᵍ

Praying Without Words • Darem Placer

The Rise and Fall of Theatre

From silent films to AI, every shift pushed theatre down—but it keeps rising back.

For those who’d rather listen.

World Theatre Day • March 27

There was a time when theatre was not a choice.

It was where people went to feel something. Stories were performed live, right in front of you. No screens. No pause. Just people, light, and a story happening in real time.

Then came the first fall.

In the 1920s, silent films filled cinemas. They reached more people, more easily, and at a lower cost. Theatre was still there, but it was no longer the center.

Then the drop deepened.

By the late 1920s, sound entered film. Talkies gave audiences voices, music, and dialogue on screen. Cinema felt complete. Theatre now had a stronger rival.

Then it rose again.

From the 1940s to the early 1950s, musicals brought life back to the stage. Oklahoma! (1943), West Side Story (1957), and The Sound of Music (1959) made theatre feel alive again. It became something people chose to experience.

Then another fall began.

By the mid-1950s, television entered the home. Entertainment no longer required going out.

By the 1960s and 1970s, color television made staying home even more appealing. Theatre lost more of its everyday audience.

Then came the quiet squeeze.

From the late 1970s into the 1990s, home media took over. Betamax and VHS allowed people to watch anytime. LaserDisc improved quality. Then CDs and DVDs made access easier. Entertainment was no longer scheduled. It was owned.

Going out became optional.

Even as this shift was happening, theatre found another way to rise.

In the 1980s, it adapted. It went bigger. Cats (1981), Les Misérables (1980), and The Phantom of the Opera (1986) turned the stage into a full experience. Theatre became an event.

Then it leveled out.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, theatre expanded globally. Touring productions reached new audiences. It was no longer the default, but it stayed alive by moving.

Then another shift.

In 2007, Netflix introduced streaming. By the mid-2010s, binge-watching became normal. By the late 2010s, multiple platforms made content endless and always available.

Staying home was no longer just easy.

For many, it felt better.

Then another rise.

In 2015, Hamilton brought new energy. It reached a younger audience and made theatre feel current again.

Then the sharpest fall.

In 2020, the pandemic closed theatres. Stages went dark across the world. For a time, theatre did not just struggle—it stopped.

And now?

It is rising again. But differently.

The audience is smaller, but more intentional. People no longer watch everything. They choose what is worth leaving the house for.

In the age of artificial intelligence, content became faster and more refined. Yet theatre remains unchanged—live, imperfect, and unrepeatable.

It cannot be replayed. It cannot be edited. It happens once, and then it is gone.

That is why it fell behind.

And that is why it keeps rising back.

Because as long as people still look for something real—the stage will never stay empty.

A video exploring the significance of theatre and drama in Ancient Greek culture and its influence on society.

⌨ ᴛʸᵖⁱⁿᵍ ᴏᵘᵗ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ʙˡᵘᵉ ᵈᵃʳᵉᵐ ᵐᵘˢⁱᶜ ᵇˡᵒᵍ

Shaping the Ensemble • Darem Placer